IHP 310 Module Two Case Study Guidelines and Rubric Overview: This case will focus specifically on cardiovascular and hematopoietic treatmen

IHP 310 Module Two Case Study Guidelines and Rubric Overview: This case study will help you practice analyzing a patient record. This case will focus specifically on cardiovascular and hematopoietic treatment. Prompt: Consider the following scenario: At age 63, Ms. Breene lived a sedentary life as a clerk in a small insurance company. She would joke that, since her dog died, her only exercise was walking back and forth to her car. She had talked with friends about joining the local health club, and it was on her to-do list, perhaps when she retired in a couple of years. Shortly before lunch one morning, someone at work found Ms. Breene at her desk in a confused and unresponsive state. A colleague drove her to the emergency room, where elevated cardiac markers and EKG changes showed that Ms. Breene had suffered a myocardial infarction. The ER doctor prescribed oxygen by mask, anticoagulants, a thrombolytic, analgesics, and a bronchodilator. In a short paper, the following critical elements must be addressed: ● Identify the incorrect medication/drug classification/treatment and explain why it is incorrect. ● What drug classification would you use instead? Why? ● Provide an example of a generic medication from each drug classification. How would each of the medications/treatments in the scenario act on the patient’s body? Support your answer with relevant resources. Rubric Guidelines for Submission: Your answers to the questions can be in short-answer or bullet-point form when appropriate. Use 12-point Times New Roman font, one-inch margins, and APA format for any citations. Instructor Feedback: This activity uses an integrated rubric in Blackboard. Students can view instructor feedback in the Grade Center. For more information, review these instructions. Critical Elements Exemplary (100%) Proficient (85%) Needs Improvement (55%) Not Evident (0%) Value Incorrect Medication/Drug Classification/Treatment Meets “Proficient” and provides exceptional detail and correctly utilizes courserelated vocabulary in the identification and explanation of the incorrect medication/drug classification/treatment and why it is incorrect Identifies the incorrect medication/drug classification/treatment and explains why it is incorrect Identifies the incorrect medication/drug classification/treatment and explains why it is incorrect, but lacks detail or clarity Does not identify the incorrect medication/drug classification/treatment and explain why it is incorrect 30 Drug Classification Meets “Proficient” and correctly applies courserelated vocabulary in the explanation of what drug classification would be used instead Explains what drug classification would be used instead Explains what drug classification would be used instead, but lacks detail or clarity Does not explain what drug classification would be used instead 30 Generic Medication Meets “Proficient” and correctly applies courserelated vocabulary in providing an example of a generic medication from each drug classification described in the scenario and explains briefly what the action of the drug is in the body Provides an example of a generic medication from each drug classification described in the scenario and explains briefly how each of the medications/treatments in the scenario would act on the patient’s body Provides an example of a generic medication from each drug classification described in the scenario and explains briefly how each of the medications/treatments in the scenario would act on the patient’s body, but lacks detail or clarity Does not provide an example of a generic medication from each drug classification described in the scenario and explain briefly how each of the medications/treatments in the scenario would act on the patient’s body 30 Articulation of Response Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization and is presented in a professional and easy-toread format Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas 10 Total 100%