the trial court correctly denied Kroger’s motion, legal homework

Discuss this case: The Supreme Court of Indiana holds that the trial court correctly denied Kroger’s motion for

; summary judgment and that the Indiana Court of Appeals was correct in affirming the

; summary judgment denial. ; The court noted other courts’ decisions establishing that a

; business’s duty of ;reasonable care regarding its invitees may include an obligation to adopt

; security measures suitable to protect them against foreseeable acts by third-party wrongdoers

; who come on the premises. ; Here, sufficient evidence suggested foreseeability, warranting a

; conclusion that Kroger owed such a duty. ; On remand, key facts that were in dispute would

; then bear upon the issue of whether Kroger breached the duty. ; Kroger Co. v. Plonski, 930

; N.E.2d 1 (Ind. Sup. Ct. 2010).

100 word thanks